EARTH MATTERS
  • Home
  • Certifications & Labeling
    • The Limits of Labeling
    • Third-Party Certifications: Worth the Investment?
    • Effectiveness of Labeling Compostable Items
    • Natural Materials and Compostability
  • Composting & Food Waste
    • Compostable Plastic is Not Garbage
    • The Dirt On Food Waste
    • Food Scraps: Too Good to Waste
    • The Circular Economy of Compostable Products
    • Composting or Recycling
    • Commercial Composting of Foodservice Ware
  • Sustainability & Legislation
    • Plastic Free July
    • Canada's Single Use Plastics Ban
    • Foodware Ordinances
    • The Dirt on Sustainable Takeout
    • The Dirt on Expanded Polystyrene
    • Restoring Ocean Ecosystems with AFO
  • Contact
  • World Centric
COMPOSTING ISSUES

Third-Party Certifications: Worth the Investment?

World Centric Resource Recovery Team

World Centric is a leading supplier of certified compostable foodservice products, offering over 400 wholesale and retail items made from renewable, plant-based materials. ​


While the sale of compostables is our ‘bread and butter,’ we also see ourselves as a thought-leader for the industry. We have never shied away from asking the tough questions or doing business a little differently than our competitors. It is because of this history and urge for holistic and transformative solutions that we have started the conversation around third-party labeling for compostable products.​​
Currently, there are two primary compostable product certifying organizations in the U.S. - the Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) and the Compost Manufacturing Alliance (CMA). Coming in third is TÜV AUSTRIA Ok Compost, most associated with home compostability certification in the U.S. ​

Picture
BPI, CMA and TUV are the three main certifying bodies for compostable products.

It is fair to say that all certifying agencies believe that consistent labeling is the most effective way to get compostable products and packaging into compost systems and prevent contamination by keeping non-compostable products out. The objective of these organizations is similar, but the path to earn certification on a product diverges slightly. ​
  • BPI certification is received based on successful ASTM Standard lab tests that are verified by a third-party outside of BPI.
  • CMA requires and verifies, internally, similar lab results and executes field testing in several different composting systems to determine successful disintegration of products.
  • TÜV AUSTRIA certifies through lab testing to European standards, which are a bit stricter for heavy metal acceptance. ​
  • All third-party certifiers will only certify products that contain no intentionally-added PFAS or “forever chemicals,” as quantified by less than 100 parts per million. ​

Picture
This table shows the differences among the top three compostability certifications.

​
As you can see in the table above, the third-party certifiers diverge when it comes to labeling of the products that successfully pass lab review or field testing. At present, only BPI requires the inclusion of their logo to be printed or embossed on all products and packaging that achieve BPI Approval. 
​
CMA and 
TÜV AUSTRIA do not currently require labeling on products and all maintain certification status, in real-time, on their web databases. The process to obtain third-party certifications is a substantial investment. Costs are incurred by the product producers at every step of the testing, certification, manufacturing and labeling processes. ​
Picture
Beginning January, 2024, BPI will require the inclusion of their logo to be printed or embossed on approved products.
Labeling is thought to be helpful to composters who process these items and to the consumer who decides how to dispose of the product. At the time of writing, there are twelve states proposing or that have already passed legislation addressing specific labeling requirements for compostable products. Requirements range from mandated use of distinguishable colors to printing or embossing an approved, certified logo onto the products, to prohibiting the use of confusing terms related to compostability, like “biodegradable”.
Most composting facilities receive TONS of organic material every day. At that volume, it is nearly impossible to identify acceptable or unacceptable items when these loads are emptied at the site. This raises the question, is legislating labeling of acceptable compostable products the best way to prevent contamination at compost facilities? 
Picture
Most composting facilities receive tons of organic material every day, making it all but impossible to identify compostable packaging through labeling.
While labeling does have a purpose, and is assumed to be the visual cue that consumers use when determining whether or not to put an item into an compost bin, we should not assume that it will be the magic bullet to both prevent compost contamination and to change human behavior. Perhaps for labeling to be effective, the legislation and certifying agencies should develop strategies to easily identify non-certified and non-compliant materials rather than require additional attempts at cleaning up the stream through additional restrictions on compliant items.
​

Lastly, if labels are required through certifying or governing agencies, do they really work? If labeling is required, is a logo the right label or is the word “Compostable” an easier message for a consumer to interpret and act upon? See our Effectiveness of Labeling blog post for more: https://www.worldcentric.net/labeling.html ​

Author Profile

The Resource Recovery Team at World Centric

Featured Stories

Picture
COMPOSTING

Effectiveness of Labeling Compostable Items

Picture
Read More
Picture
SOCIAL

The Circular Economy Of Compostable Products

Picture
Read More
Picture
ENVIRONMENT

We Must Take Action On Climate Change Now

Picture
Read More

Home

About

About Earth Matters
Contact

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to stay aware of new articles, events and urgent issues.
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2024 WORLD CENTRIC
PRIVACY POLICY.
  • Home
  • Certifications & Labeling
    • The Limits of Labeling
    • Third-Party Certifications: Worth the Investment?
    • Effectiveness of Labeling Compostable Items
    • Natural Materials and Compostability
  • Composting & Food Waste
    • Compostable Plastic is Not Garbage
    • The Dirt On Food Waste
    • Food Scraps: Too Good to Waste
    • The Circular Economy of Compostable Products
    • Composting or Recycling
    • Commercial Composting of Foodservice Ware
  • Sustainability & Legislation
    • Plastic Free July
    • Canada's Single Use Plastics Ban
    • Foodware Ordinances
    • The Dirt on Sustainable Takeout
    • The Dirt on Expanded Polystyrene
    • Restoring Ocean Ecosystems with AFO
  • Contact
  • World Centric